ryantimwilson / rpms / systemd

Forked from rpms/systemd a month ago
Clone
Blob Blame History Raw
From b5eddaf0dea35bda7b68a401119c5f9f9104fb99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Pitt <martin.pitt@ubuntu.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:03:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Install: correctly report symlink creations

All callers of create_symlink(), such as install_info_symlink_wants(), expect
that to return > 0 if it actually did something, and then return that number.
unit_file_enable() uses that to determine if any action was done
(carries_install_info != 0) and if not, show a "The unit files have no
[Install] section" warning.

Return 1 instead of 0 in the two code paths of create_symlink() when the link
was created or replaced with a new value.

This fixes getting a bogus "No [Install] section" warning when enabling a unit
with full path, like "systemctl enable /some/path/myunit.service".

(cherry picked from commit 3de1521427dee61000c1c124a521182b301a50de)
Resolves: #1435098
---
 src/shared/install.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/shared/install.c b/src/shared/install.c
index bdfd7b96a2..e73f0c95bd 100644
--- a/src/shared/install.c
+++ b/src/shared/install.c
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int create_symlink(
 
         if (symlink(old_path, new_path) >= 0) {
                 unit_file_changes_add(changes, n_changes, UNIT_FILE_SYMLINK, new_path, old_path);
-                return 0;
+                return 1;
         }
 
         if (errno != EEXIST)
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static int create_symlink(
         unit_file_changes_add(changes, n_changes, UNIT_FILE_UNLINK, new_path, NULL);
         unit_file_changes_add(changes, n_changes, UNIT_FILE_SYMLINK, new_path, old_path);
 
-        return 0;
+        return 1;
 }
 
 static int mark_symlink_for_removal(