4295f9
From 18936c8ee21fabb2036b1849a4bb7f5b64bee897 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
4295f9
From: Yu Watanabe <watanabe.yu+github@gmail.com>
4295f9
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 06:58:59 +0900
4295f9
Subject: [PATCH] udev-node: assume no new claim to a symlink if
4295f9
 /run/udev/links is not updated
4295f9
4295f9
During creating a symlink to a device node, if another device node which
4295f9
requests the same symlink is added/removed, `stat_inode_unmodified()`
4295f9
should always detects that. We do not need to continue the loop
4295f9
unconditionally.
4295f9
4295f9
(cherry picked from commit 8f27311eb2aec2411d1fb7d62e6c9d75d21ae8df)
4295f9
4295f9
Related: #1977994
4295f9
---
4295f9
 src/udev/udev-node.c | 5 -----
4295f9
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
4295f9
4295f9
diff --git a/src/udev/udev-node.c b/src/udev/udev-node.c
4295f9
index 0de848da19..1a34ea8128 100644
4295f9
--- a/src/udev/udev-node.c
4295f9
+++ b/src/udev/udev-node.c
4295f9
@@ -491,11 +491,6 @@ static int link_update(sd_device *dev, const char *slink_in, bool add) {
4295f9
                 r = node_symlink(dev, target, slink);
4295f9
                 if (r < 0)
4295f9
                         return r;
4295f9
-                if (r == 1)
4295f9
-                        /* We have replaced already existing symlink, possibly there is some other device trying
4295f9
-                         * to claim the same symlink. Let's do one more iteration to give us a chance to fix
4295f9
-                         * the error if other device actually claims the symlink with higher priority. */
4295f9
-                        continue;
4295f9
 
4295f9
                 /* Skip the second stat() if the first failed, stat_inode_unmodified() would return false regardless. */
4295f9
                 if ((st1.st_mode & S_IFMT) != 0) {