Blame SOURCES/gcc11-no-add-needed.patch

2e9d4a
2010-02-08  Roland McGrath  <roland@redhat.com>
2e9d4a
2e9d4a
	* config/gnu-user.h (LINK_EH_SPEC): Pass --no-add-needed to the linker.
2e9d4a
	* config/alpha/elf.h (LINK_EH_SPEC): Likewise.
2e9d4a
	* config/ia64/linux.h (LINK_EH_SPEC): Likewise.
2e9d4a
2e9d4a
--- gcc/config/alpha/elf.h.jj	2011-01-03 12:52:31.118056764 +0100
2e9d4a
+++ gcc/config/alpha/elf.h	2011-01-04 18:14:10.931874160 +0100
2e9d4a
@@ -168,5 +168,5 @@ extern int alpha_this_gpdisp_sequence_nu
2e9d4a
    I imagine that other systems will catch up.  In the meantime, it
2e9d4a
    doesn't harm to make sure that the data exists to be used later.  */
2e9d4a
 #if defined(HAVE_LD_EH_FRAME_HDR)
2e9d4a
-#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr} "
2e9d4a
+#define LINK_EH_SPEC "--no-add-needed %{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr} "
2e9d4a
 #endif
2e9d4a
--- gcc/config/ia64/linux.h.jj	2011-01-03 13:02:11.462994522 +0100
2e9d4a
+++ gcc/config/ia64/linux.h	2011-01-04 18:14:10.931874160 +0100
2e9d4a
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ do {						\
2e9d4a
    Signalize that because we have fde-glibc, we don't need all C shared libs
2e9d4a
    linked against -lgcc_s.  */
2e9d4a
 #undef LINK_EH_SPEC
2e9d4a
-#define LINK_EH_SPEC ""
2e9d4a
+#define LINK_EH_SPEC "--no-add-needed "
2e9d4a
 
2e9d4a
 #undef TARGET_INIT_LIBFUNCS
2e9d4a
 #define TARGET_INIT_LIBFUNCS ia64_soft_fp_init_libfuncs
2e9d4a
--- gcc/config/gnu-user.h.jj	2011-01-03 12:53:03.739057299 +0100
2e9d4a
+++ gcc/config/gnu-user.h	2011-01-04 18:14:10.932814884 +0100
2e9d4a
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTI
2e9d4a
 #define LIB_SPEC GNU_USER_TARGET_LIB_SPEC
2e9d4a
 
2e9d4a
 #if defined(HAVE_LD_EH_FRAME_HDR)
2e9d4a
-#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr} "
2e9d4a
+#define LINK_EH_SPEC "--no-add-needed %{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr} "
2e9d4a
 #endif
2e9d4a
 
2e9d4a
 #define GNU_USER_TARGET_LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC \