5d3444
From 6fc38d1c75ce5a6172267e6ca162c4fdc09657ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
5d3444
From: Petr Mensik <pemensik@redhat.com>
5d3444
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:56:12 +0200
5d3444
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] CVE-2021-25215
5d3444
5d3444
5616.	[security]	named crashed when a DNAME record placed in the ANSWER
5d3444
			section during DNAME chasing turned out to be the final
5d3444
			answer to a client query. (CVE-2021-25215) [GL #2540]
5d3444
---
5d3444
 bin/named/query.c | 13 ++++++++++---
5d3444
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
5d3444
5d3444
diff --git a/bin/named/query.c b/bin/named/query.c
5d3444
index a95f5ad..11a888e 100644
5d3444
--- a/bin/named/query.c
5d3444
+++ b/bin/named/query.c
5d3444
@@ -9301,10 +9301,17 @@ query_find(ns_client_t *client, dns_fetchevent_t *event, dns_rdatatype_t qtype)
5d3444
 		if (noqname != NULL)
5d3444
 			query_addnoqnameproof(client, noqname);
5d3444
 		/*
5d3444
-		 * We shouldn't ever fail to add 'rdataset'
5d3444
-		 * because it's already in the answer.
5d3444
+		 * 'rdataset' will only be non-NULL here if the ANSWER section
5d3444
+		 * of the message to be sent to the client already contains an
5d3444
+		 * RRset with the same owner name and the same type as
5d3444
+		 * 'rdataset'.  This should never happen, with one exception:
5d3444
+		 * when chasing DNAME records, one of the DNAME records placed
5d3444
+		 * in the ANSWER section may turn out to be the final answer to
5d3444
+		 * the client's query, but we have no way of knowing that until
5d3444
+		 * now.  In such a case, 'rdataset' will be freed later, so we
5d3444
+		 * do not need to free it here.
5d3444
 		 */
5d3444
-		INSIST(rdataset == NULL);
5d3444
+		INSIST(rdataset == NULL || qtype == dns_rdatatype_dname);
5d3444
 	}
5d3444
 
5d3444
  addauth:
5d3444
-- 
5d3444
2.26.3
5d3444