ryantimwilson / rpms / systemd

Forked from rpms/systemd a month ago
Clone
dd65c9
From 245ad27530ae9e99242ebfa1631bd7fc8f66a59c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
dd65c9
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
dd65c9
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:20:49 +0200
dd65c9
Subject: [PATCH] journal: don't force FS_NOCOW_FL on new journal files, but
dd65c9
 warn if it is missing
dd65c9
dd65c9
This way users have the freedom to set or unset the FS_NOCOW_FL flag on
dd65c9
their journal files by setting it on the journal directory. Since our
dd65c9
default tmpfiles configuration now sets this flag on the directory the
dd65c9
flag is set by default on new files, however people can opt-out of this
dd65c9
by masking the tmpfiles file for it.
dd65c9
dd65c9
(cherry picked from commit fc68c92973e5437ee0489c1bc80d80f0a7b6ca0b)
dd65c9
dd65c9
Conflicts:
dd65c9
	src/journal/journal-file.c
dd65c9
dd65c9
Resolves: #1299714
dd65c9
---
23b3cf
 src/journal/journal-file.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
dd65c9
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
dd65c9
dd65c9
diff --git a/src/journal/journal-file.c b/src/journal/journal-file.c
dd65c9
index 8034b771d..0fd59ec07 100644
dd65c9
--- a/src/journal/journal-file.c
dd65c9
+++ b/src/journal/journal-file.c
dd65c9
@@ -2543,6 +2543,41 @@ void journal_file_print_header(JournalFile *f) {
dd65c9
                 printf("Disk usage: %s\n", format_bytes(bytes, sizeof(bytes), (off_t) st.st_blocks * 512ULL));
dd65c9
 }
dd65c9
 
dd65c9
+static int journal_file_warn_btrfs(JournalFile *f) {
dd65c9
+        unsigned attrs;
dd65c9
+        int r;
dd65c9
+
dd65c9
+        assert(f);
dd65c9
+
dd65c9
+        /* Before we write anything, check if the COW logic is turned
dd65c9
+         * off on btrfs. Given our write pattern that is quite
dd65c9
+         * unfriendly to COW file systems this should greatly improve
dd65c9
+         * performance on COW file systems, such as btrfs, at the
dd65c9
+         * expense of data integrity features (which shouldn't be too
dd65c9
+         * bad, given that we do our own checksumming). */
dd65c9
+
dd65c9
+        r = btrfs_is_filesystem(f->fd);
dd65c9
+        if (r < 0)
dd65c9
+                return log_warning_errno(r, "Failed to determine if journal is on btrfs: %m");
dd65c9
+        if (!r)
dd65c9
+                return 0;
dd65c9
+
dd65c9
+        r = read_attr_fd(f->fd, &attrs);
dd65c9
+        if (r < 0)
dd65c9
+                return log_warning_errno(r, "Failed to read file attributes: %m");
dd65c9
+
dd65c9
+        if (attrs & FS_NOCOW_FL) {
dd65c9
+                log_debug("Detected btrfs file system with copy-on-write disabled, all is good.");
dd65c9
+                return 0;
dd65c9
+        }
dd65c9
+
dd65c9
+        log_notice("Creating journal file %s on a btrfs file system, and copy-on-write is enabled. "
dd65c9
+                   "This is likely to slow down journal access substantially, please consider turning "
dd65c9
+                   "off the copy-on-write file attribute on the journal directory, using chattr +C.", f->path);
dd65c9
+
dd65c9
+        return 1;
dd65c9
+}
dd65c9
+
dd65c9
 int journal_file_open(
dd65c9
                 const char *fname,
dd65c9
                 int flags,
dd65c9
@@ -2623,16 +2658,7 @@ int journal_file_open(
dd65c9
 
dd65c9
         if (f->last_stat.st_size == 0 && f->writable) {
dd65c9
 
dd65c9
-                /* Before we write anything, turn off COW logic. Given
dd65c9
-                 * our write pattern that is quite unfriendly to COW
dd65c9
-                 * file systems this should greatly improve
dd65c9
-                 * performance on COW file systems, such as btrfs, at
dd65c9
-                 * the expense of data integrity features (which
dd65c9
-                 * shouldn't be too bad, given that we do our own
dd65c9
-                 * checksumming). */
dd65c9
-                r = chattr_fd(f->fd, true, FS_NOCOW_FL);
dd65c9
-                if (r < 0 && r != -ENOTTY)
dd65c9
-                        log_warning_errno(r, "Failed to set file attributes: %m");
dd65c9
+                (void) journal_file_warn_btrfs(f);
dd65c9
 
dd65c9
                 /* Let's attach the creation time to the journal file,
dd65c9
                  * so that the vacuuming code knows the age of this