daandemeyer / rpms / systemd

Forked from rpms/systemd 2 years ago
Clone
4295f9
From 458a6cd748ee5555b6957888b69d475ac3f619c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
4295f9
From: Yu Watanabe <watanabe.yu+github@gmail.com>
4295f9
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:29:42 +0900
4295f9
Subject: [PATCH] udev-node: drop redundant trial of devlink creation
4295f9
4295f9
Previously, the devlink was created based on the priority saved in udev
4295f9
database. So, we needed to reevaluate devlinks after database is saved.
4295f9
4295f9
But now the priority is stored in the symlink under /run/udev/links, and
4295f9
the loop of devlink creation is controlled with the timestamp of the
4295f9
directory. So, the double evaluation is not necessary anymore.
4295f9
4295f9
(cherry picked from commit 7920d0a135fb6a08aa0bfc31e9d0a3f589fe7a1f)
4295f9
4295f9
Related: #1977994
4295f9
---
4295f9
 src/udev/udev-event.c |  5 +----
4295f9
 src/udev/udev-node.c  | 12 ++++--------
4295f9
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
4295f9
4295f9
diff --git a/src/udev/udev-event.c b/src/udev/udev-event.c
4295f9
index 8b9f8aecfe..c77f55c67e 100644
4295f9
--- a/src/udev/udev-event.c
4295f9
+++ b/src/udev/udev-event.c
4295f9
@@ -1060,10 +1060,7 @@ int udev_event_execute_rules(
4295f9
 
4295f9
         device_set_is_initialized(dev);
4295f9
 
4295f9
-        /* Yes, we run update_devnode() twice, because in the first invocation, that is before update of udev database,
4295f9
-         * it could happen that two contenders are replacing each other's symlink. Hence we run it again to make sure
4295f9
-         * symlinks point to devices that claim them with the highest priority. */
4295f9
-        return update_devnode(event);
4295f9
+        return 0;
4295f9
 }
4295f9
 
4295f9
 void udev_event_execute_run(UdevEvent *event, usec_t timeout_usec, int timeout_signal) {
4295f9
diff --git a/src/udev/udev-node.c b/src/udev/udev-node.c
4295f9
index 675e6ce313..bb551d86b0 100644
4295f9
--- a/src/udev/udev-node.c
4295f9
+++ b/src/udev/udev-node.c
4295f9
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static int link_update(sd_device *dev, const char *slink_in, bool add) {
4295f9
         _cleanup_free_ char *slink = NULL, *dirname = NULL;
4295f9
         const char *slink_name;
4295f9
         char name_enc[NAME_MAX+1];
4295f9
-        int i, r, retries;
4295f9
+        int r;
4295f9
 
4295f9
         assert(dev);
4295f9
         assert(slink_in);
4295f9
@@ -443,11 +443,7 @@ static int link_update(sd_device *dev, const char *slink_in, bool add) {
4295f9
         if (r < 0)
4295f9
                 return r;
4295f9
 
4295f9
-        /* If the database entry is not written yet we will just do one iteration and possibly wrong symlink
4295f9
-         * will be fixed in the second invocation. */
4295f9
-        retries = sd_device_get_is_initialized(dev) > 0 ? LINK_UPDATE_MAX_RETRIES : 1;
4295f9
-
4295f9
-        for (i = 0; i < retries; i++) {
4295f9
+        for (unsigned i = 0; i < LINK_UPDATE_MAX_RETRIES; i++) {
4295f9
                 _cleanup_free_ char *target = NULL;
4295f9
                 struct stat st1 = {}, st2 = {};
4295f9
 
4295f9
@@ -472,7 +468,7 @@ static int link_update(sd_device *dev, const char *slink_in, bool add) {
4295f9
                                 log_device_debug_errno(dev, errno, "Failed to remove '%s', ignoring: %m", slink);
4295f9
 
4295f9
                         (void) rmdir_parents(slink, "/dev");
4295f9
-                        break;
4295f9
+                        return 0;
4295f9
                 }
4295f9
 
4295f9
                 r = node_symlink(dev, target, slink);
4295f9
@@ -487,7 +483,7 @@ static int link_update(sd_device *dev, const char *slink_in, bool add) {
4295f9
                         return 0;
4295f9
         }
4295f9
 
4295f9
-        return i < LINK_UPDATE_MAX_RETRIES ? 0 : -ELOOP;
4295f9
+        return -ELOOP;
4295f9
 }
4295f9
 
4295f9
 static int device_get_devpath_by_devnum(sd_device *dev, char **ret) {